An aerial view of construction work on Kingaroy’s new waste water treatment plant; the State Government has contributed $10 million towards the project, and a loan makes up the rest
SBRC Mayor Wayne Kratzmann
South Burnett Mayor Wayne Kratzmann (Photo: SBRC)

March 17, 2016

Claims aired by some candidates during the election campaign that the South Burnett Regional Council is carrying a $62 million debt are untrue.

South Burnett Mayor Wayne Kratzmann said this week the claims appear to have come from a misunderstanding about how Council’s finances are structured and reported.

“If you define debt as ‘borrowed money’ that we have to pay interest on, our debt is $40 million,” the Mayor said.

“But since $2 million of that will be repaid by Memerambi Estate property owners, the real debt ratepayers are paying interest on at the moment is $38 million.”

The Mayor said a further $12 million of what has been called “Council debt” was the Council’s depreciation fund, money that has been set aside in a cash reserve to upgrade or replace Council assets as they age.

“It is something that was mandated by law when Councils were amalgamated in 2008, and it’s really an asset, not a debt,” the Mayor said.

However, because of the nature of local government accounting, it has to be listed in the Council’s accounts as a liability.

No interest is paid on this money; instead it actually earns interest for the Council.

The remaining $10 million is in current liabilities from day-to-day operations. This is balanced against an almost equal amount of current assets from day-to-day operations, and it carries no interest component, either.

The Mayor said the Council’s $38 million debt had been raised to fund long-term infrastructure projects.

These included the new Kingaroy Waste Water Treatment Plant, the Gordonbrook Water Treatment Plant upgrade, Blackbutt CBD infrastructure upgrades, several bridge replacement projects and similar works.

He said it made better sense to borrow money for these projects than raise rates sharply in order to fund them without borrowing, since the benefits would be enjoyed by ratepayers over many generations.

The Council’s loans come from Queensland Treasury, and before issuing them the Council was put through a rigorous financial analysis by Treasury officials to ensure the SBRC had the capacity to manage the repayments without difficulty.

The Mayor said Council had come through the pre-loan approval process “with flying colours” and the debt represented less than 4.65 per cent of Council’s total assets.

The Council currently has $35 million cash in the bank, which is sufficient to fund five and a half months of normal operations.

Each year the Council repays around $3.7 million in principal and interest on its loan borrowings.


 

3 Responses to "$62m Debt Claim Untrue: Mayor"

  1. Candidate Division 6. No wonder that our Councils is in such a mess!! On 25 February 2016 Keith Campbell reported “Finances Good, But Cash Tight” in this paper. Cr Campbell reported in his report that we have a debt of $62 million and that the ratio is 6.6%. Make up your mind boys!!

  2. Tom – we have been trying to clear up this confusion …

    To our understanding:

    – $38m real debt (which council pays interest on)
    – $2m debt (owed by Memerambi owners, who will repay the principal and interest)

    So anyone who says the debt is $38m or $40m is right.

    Plus

    – $10m in current liabilities (bills to be paid, wages, super etc)

    So anyone who says the debt is $50m could be said to be right, except this $10m is balanced out by another $10m on the other side of the ledger so it is actually neutral

    – $12m in depreciation costs (money set aside to replace future assets – which actually earns the Council interest)

    Add these figures up and you get $62 million – but it is not all borrowed money, or what you and I would normally call debt unless we were accountants.

  3. Tom, please read the “Finances Good, But Cash Tight” article again. Cr Campbell did NOT talk about total council assets, total debt or the debt-to-equity ratio that is mentioned in the final three paragraphs of this article – we did. Had Cr Campbell come up with this data at the meeting we would have quoted him, but we didn’t.

    Instead, we added this data in as useful background information for our readers. It was drawn directly from the “Statement Of Financial Position As At 11-Feb-16” that was tendered at the same February 24 meeting.

    We didn’t realise that this would cause you so much anguish that you would base your entire election campaign on it. Queensland Treasury, after all, have rated Council’s financial position as very sound.

    So this week we asked Mayor Kratzmann to clarify the SBRC’s exact debt position – which led to THIS article – in order to avoid any further confusion on the matter.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.